Advancing Executive Leadership Pathways for Doctorally Trained Physician Associates: A Strategic Framework for Chief Advanced Practice and Related C Suite Roles

Peter Yen, DMSc, MSHA, PA-C, LSSGB

Executive Summary

Healthcare delivery in the United States has undergone profound structural transformation over the past two decades. Care models have shifted from physician centric hierarchies toward integrated, team-based systems that rely heavily on advanced practice clinicians.¹,² Yet executive governance structures have not evolved at the same pace.

Physicians commonly ascend to Chief Medical Officer roles. Nursing leadership pathways culminate in Chief Nursing Officer positions supported by formal competency frameworks.⁸,¹⁰ In contrast, physician associates, despite rapid workforce growth and expanding scope of responsibility, lack clearly defined enterprise level executive career tracks.¹–³

This white paper advances a structured, evidence informed exploration of executive pathways for doctorally trained physician associates. It argues that formalizing such pathways aligns governance with contemporary team-based practice models, strengthens workforce retention, enhances system performance, and distributes clinical and administrative burden more effectively across the C suite.⁵,⁶,¹⁵

I. Workforce Evolution and Structural Misalignment

Growth and Clinical Integration

The physician associate workforce now exceeds 168000 certified professionals nationwide.¹ Workforce projections forecast continued above average growth compared with most other health professions.² Predictive modeling demonstrates sustained demand through at least 2025 and beyond.³

Physician associates increasingly manage complex patients, participate in specialty care, and influence cost and utilization outcomes.⁴ Evidence demonstrates that teams incorporating physician associates achieve comparable quality outcomes with efficient resource utilization.⁴

Despite this integration, executive representation remains limited.

Executive Structure Lag

Healthcare governance structures were largely shaped during periods of physician dominated practice models and hierarchical nursing administration.¹³ As a result:

• Physicians commonly progress to Chief Medical Officer roles

• Nursing leadership pipelines culminate in Chief Nursing Officer positions supported by national competency standards⁸,¹⁰

• Physician associates often plateau at departmental leadership levels

This misalignment between workforce reality and governance design reflects structural inertia rather than strategic intent.

II. Doctoral Education and Executive Competency Alignment

Doctoral education for physician associates has expanded significantly.²⁰ Programs increasingly emphasize health systems science, finance, policy, quality improvement, and organizational leadership.

These domains mirror executive competencies outlined by the American College of Healthcare Executives.⁹ Leadership science literature supports formal training as a predictor of organizational effectiveness.¹⁶

Doctorally trained physician associates are therefore being prepared with competencies traditionally associated with enterprise leadership. The leadership infrastructure now exists. The executive pathways do not.

III. Strategic Rationale for Executive Inclusion

1. Governance Alignment With Team Based Care

The National Academy of Medicine has emphasized interprofessional collaboration as foundational to diagnostic safety and quality improvement.⁷ Modern care delivery depends on coordinated teams.¹²

Collective leadership models demonstrate improved performance outcomes in complex healthcare systems.¹⁵ Governance that mirrors interdisciplinary clinical structures improves coherence and execution.

If care delivery is team based, executive governance should reflect that reality.

2. Workforce Retention and Burnout Mitigation

Burnout among healthcare professionals remains a major threat to system stability.⁶,¹⁷ The Quadruple Aim framework recognizes that provider well being is essential to sustainable health system performance.⁵

COVID related stress data demonstrate persistent work intention volatility across healthcare professionals.¹⁹

Structured career ladders enhance engagement and retention. Providing visible executive pathways for advanced practice clinicians supports long term workforce investment and institutional loyalty.

3. Administrative Burden Redistribution

Administrative complexity has intensified across regulatory, accreditation, and payer domains.⁶,¹⁷ Distributing oversight responsibilities across additional qualified executives increases resilience and reduces concentrated burden within traditional roles.

This redistribution is not dilution of authority. It is organizational strengthening.

4. Performance and Financial Strategy

Healthcare strategy literature emphasizes integrated delivery systems, value based care alignment, and operational redesign.¹²–¹⁴

Physician associates frequently possess cross continuum clinical experience that informs service line integration, ambulatory expansion, and operational throughput improvement.

Research examining leadership and hospital performance suggests that clinical leadership experience correlates with performance outcomes.¹⁸

Multidisciplinary executive representation enhances insight across operational domains.

IV. Proposed Executive Role Models

Chief Advanced Practice Officer

Enterprise oversight of advanced practice clinicians may include:

• Credentialing and scope governance

• Workforce deployment analytics

• Professional development infrastructure

• Quality and productivity benchmarking

Standardization across departments reduces fragmentation and aligns advanced practice utilization with system strategy.¹³,¹⁴

Chief Clinical Officer

A physician associate with doctoral and operational experience may serve in a system level clinical integration role emphasizing:

• Quality and safety metrics

• Interdisciplinary pathway standardization

• Regulatory oversight coordination

Collective leadership frameworks support distributed executive authority in complex organizations.¹⁵

Chief Administrative Officer

Hybrid clinical administrative leaders contribute to:

• Market expansion strategy

• Ambulatory network integration• Fiscal stewardship

• Operational redesign

Organizational design literature supports strategic alignment between frontline knowledge and executive decision making.¹⁴

These roles are collaborative expansions, not replacements, of existing C suite positions.

V. Addressing Common Concerns

Professional Boundaries

Executive authority is competency based, not degree exclusive. Leadership effectiveness depends on governance skill, strategic capacity, and systems insight.¹⁶

Formal inclusion of physician associates complements existing leadership rather than diminishing it.

Regulatory Considerations

Scope of practice statutes govern clinical care, not executive governance. Organizational leadership design remains within board discretion.

Cultural Inertia

Healthcare has historically evolved leadership structures in response to workforce transformation.⁸,¹³ Structural adaptation reflects organizational maturity.

VI. Implementation Framework

A phased implementation strategy may include:

• Phase I. Governance review and executive architecture assessment

• Phase II. Role definition, reporting structure alignment, and board approval

• Phase III. Leadership development pipeline construction aligned with executive competencies⁹

• Phase IV. Outcome measurement tied to quality, workforce retention, and financial performance

Strategic integration ensures clarity and avoids role duplication.

VII. Conclusion

Doctorally trained physician associates represent a strategically positioned leadership resource within modern health systems.¹,³

Formal executive pathways such as Chief Advanced Practice Officer, Chief Clinical Officer, or Chief Administrative Officer reflect structural necessity grounded in workforce data, leadership science, and health system redesign literature.⁴,¹²,¹⁵

Healthcare delivery has evolved into a team based enterprise.¹² Governance must evolve accordingly.

Forward thinking systems that cultivate multidisciplinary executive leadership will be better positioned to manage workforce complexity, regulatory pressures, and financial sustainability in the decades ahead.

The future of healthcare leadership will not be defined by hierarchy alone, but by strategic alignment with how care is truly delivered.

References

1.     National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants. 2023 Statistical Profile of Certified Physician Associates. NCCPA; 2023.

2.     U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Physician Assistants. Updated 2023.

3.     Hooker RS, Cawley JF, Everett CM. Predictive modeling the physician assistant supply: 2010–2025. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(5):708–716.

4.     Morgan PA, Smith VA, Berkowitz TSZ, et al. Impact of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants on utilization and costs for complex patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(6):1028–1036.

5.     Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573–576.

6.     Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, West CP. Addressing physician burnout: the way forward. JAMA. 2017;317(9):901–902.

7.     National Academy of Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press; 2015.

8.     Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. National Academies Press; 2011.

9.     American College of Healthcare Executives. Healthcare Executive Competencies Assessment Tool. ACHE; 2022.

10.  American Organization for Nursing Leadership. AONL Nurse Executive Competencies. AONL; 2022.

11.  Frist WH. Shattuck lecture: health care in the 21st century. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(3):267–272.

12.  Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(10):50–70.

13.  Shortell SM, Gillies RR, Anderson DA. The new world of managed care: creating organized delivery systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 1994;13(5):46–64.

14.  Bohmer RMJ. Designing Care: Aligning the Nature and Management of Health Care. Harvard Business Press; 2009.

15.  West MA, Lyubovnikova J, Eckert R, Denis JL. Collective leadership for cultures of high quality health care. J Organ Eff People Perform. 2014;1(3):240–260.

16.  Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, Weber TJ. Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:421–449.

17.  Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: a potential threat to successful health care reform. JAMA. 2011;305(19):2009–2010.

18.  Goodall AH. Physician leaders and hospital performance: is there an association? Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(4):535–539.

19.  Sinsky CA, Brown RL, Stillman MJ, Linzer M. COVID related stress and work intentions in a sample of US health care workers. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021;5(6):1165–1173.

20.  American Academy of PAs. 2023 PA Education Report. AAPA; 2023.